In the world of animal use, some issues are so black-and-white that there is no real debate over the right course of action in society: Dogfighting and cockfighting, for example, are conducted only for gambling wagers and the titillation of spectators who enjoy the bloodletting, and there is no redeeming social value for staged animal combat.
Some issues pose far more difficult moral questions for us as a society. The use of animals in military training and testing is one such area, where animals are used and harmed, but for the stated purpose of helping our soldiers on the battlefield. The military uses live monkeys to train medical personnel to treat casualties of chemical and biological agent attacks, and uses live pigs and goats to teach physicians, medics, and other personnel how to perform surgery or first aid on severely injured troops.
In one form of chemical casualty management training, anesthetized primates are given a chemical called physostigmine, which simulates exposure to a nerve gas by causing cholinergic intoxication. This intoxication may include symptoms such as salivation, difficulty swallowing, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting, increased heart rate, muscle twitches, weakness, paralysis, seizures and coma. In another experiment performed last year, military researchers dressed live pigs in body armor and strapped them into Humvee simulators that were then blown up with explosives to study the link between roadside bomb blasts and brain injury.
When animals are used in experimentation and training, the protocols should be refined to minimize pain and distress to the animals, the number of animals used should be reduced to a minimum, and animal use should be replaced with non-animal methods when possible. Thankfully, there have been great strides in the development of human-based training methods, such as medical simulators, to teach management of hemorrhage, sucking chest wounds, airway compromise, and many other combat trauma injuries, as well as the management of patients exposed to biological and chemical agents.
While these human-based training methods are now widespread in the civilian sector, the outdated and inefficient use of live animals is still used in many military courses. But the pace of the military adopting these improved methods may soon be accelerated, as Rep. Bob Filner, D-Calif., chairman of the House Veterans Affairs Committee, has introduced new legislation that encourages innovation and modernization in this area.
The “Battlefield Excellence through Superior Training (BEST) Practices Act,” H.R. 4269, will phase in the use of human-based methods for combat trauma training by 2014, require their immediate use for chemical and biological agent training, and speed up the military’s development and acquisition of methods such as medical simulators, immersive simulated combat environments, and moulage. We are grateful to Rep. Filner for introducing this important bill that will not only reduce and replace animal use, but will also improve medical care for our service members and reduce costs by modernizing the training programs.
Other members of Congress have advanced this issue as well. Earlier this year, Sen. Robert C. Byrd, D-W.Va., successfully included a provision in the Senate Defense Appropriations Bill directing the Army to produce a report on the use of live primates in training related to chemical and biological agents. And Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., led a letter by fifteen members of Congress urging the Army to phase out the use of live animals in trauma training.
The fact that lawmakers are giving such serious attention to this issue is a real marker for our cause, and a clear indicator that the welfare of animals can and should be considered even when the stakes are so high for people. Now Congress should pass the BEST Practices Act, to make sure we are doing the best we can for our soldiers and animals.